On 07/12/07 00:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > No, as there was not published from the version 4.2.0 > > > > > My apologies, but I am not sure which of my questions this is response to. > No it is not a bug? Or No it is not safe to use 4.3.1 modules in 4.2.0? Or > No to both? To hopefully clarify, here are my questions: > > 1. Is the regular expression as distributed in 4.2.0 a bug because it does > not show the 4.3.1 labelled modules?
No, the regexp is correct > > 2. What does the 4.3.1 labels on the modules indicate? > The module was published with a version 4.3.x (a trunk version from the subversion) > 3. Is it safe to use a module labelled 4.3.1 in my 4.2.0 version? > As it was not published nor tested with the 4.2.x, I can't say it is safe. But you can try it... -- Cédric Krier Tiny sprl Chaussée de Namur, 40 B-1367 Gérompont Belgique Tel: +32 81 81 37 00 Fax: +32 81 73 35 01 Web: http://www.tiny.be
pgp3CKKEdBCh5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users
