Would it be better to store this data and picture data separately like a case or event and then use an action or tree view to lower initial transfer?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:57 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > Yes, I'm seeing a good bit of delay. It takes about 3-4 times as long to > load the Partner form and when we are on a remote connection over a wireless > link this means about 12-20 secs to load just a single Partner record. I'm > sure Postgresql is contributing a lot of this delay so I'm going to start > doing some testing on it. Also one of the one2many widgets has photo data > in it and that seems to be slowing down that particular widget quite a bit. > This is why I was looking for an on_change attribute for the binary widget so > that I could reduce the pic size before they hit the db. The new application > functions ok, but it's like it's in slow motion. > > Regards, > Gerry > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinyerp-users mailing list > http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users > -- Andrew "lathama" Latham Principal TuxTone Inc. http://TuxTone.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users
