gegard wrote:
> I don't really accept Amit's point:
> 
> amit wrote:
> > ... frequent changes in UI (from server views) which breaks those tests... 
> 
> because it is the effects of those sort of changes that we hope to stabilize.


My point is that UI testing with Selinuim is not much useful as it is difficult 
to test Ajax requests, JavaScript code, popup windows (actually, I found it 
only useful for input testing, which I think not much helpful). In my opinion, 
it's more important to focus on server side (web server, in this case) testing 
then client testing...

-- Amit




-------------------- m2f --------------------

--
http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=34133#34133

-------------------- m2f --------------------


_______________________________________________
Tinyerp-users mailing list
http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users

Reply via email to