amit wrote: > ... UI testing with Selinuim is not much useful as it is difficult to test > Ajax requests, JavaScript code, popup windows (actually, I found it only > useful for input testing, which I think not much helpful).
I agree with you that the client-side Ajax work is difficult to test, and possibly don't need to be tested routinely. amit wrote: > ...In my opinion, it's more important to focus on server side (web server, in > this case) testing then client testing... But I think that input and output testing is best done where the user sees it (and where the tester can understand it) - at the client side. Not for everything, because client-side testing is slow, but to make sure that the basic functions still work after all the major improvements you have been making. ------------------------ Regards, Geoff Seath Solutions Ltd (http://www.seathsolutions.com) -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=34138#34138 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users
