@sraps,
> Probably have to look a bit closer, but I think it is not a good approach to > place meta data inside the object itself. > > Concerns: > 1) What would happen if we will try to migrate to next version? We will > probably have to remove this meta data manually. > 2) This process is being done once (maybe several times, doing it partially), > and there is no need to place mappings side bu side with the data itself. > This approach is better for systems that should be kept synchronized > constantly, so the process is being done again and again. > > But still it is superficial opinion, and it would be nice to hear your > comments on this... Actually we now using the ir_model_data for bookeepng external ids. This has been debated long with Fabien Pinckaers and Sharoon Thomas over #openobject IRC those last days. This isn't going to impact visible perf due to the fact that external synch as other bottlenecks such as webservices. Object mappings metadata is not inside the business objects either. We will let you know soon about our migration script. ------------------------ Raphaël Valyi CEO and OpenERP consultant at http://www.akretion.com -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=45539#45539 -------------------- m2f --------------------
_______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users
