sraps wrote: > ... It is unclear who is in charge for fixing bugs in core, where the quality > team seems to be in charge. ... It seems that the bug-fixing process, even in > a core system, is being done on occasional base, by a community. ...
There have been several similar questions which have attracted some responses (such as this http://www.openobject.com/forum/topic13013.html). I don't think that the quality has been fully addressed yet, but Tiny's direct customers are probably not complaining about the specific issues you have identified (otherwise Tiny would be fixing it). sraps wrote: > ...Why dreaming of a version freeze and upcoming 6.0, if there is such a mess > with current branch? ... I didn't realise that version 6 was imminent. Isn't it 5.2 next? sraps wrote: > ... Jumping up the versions each year, does not make this software more > mature, or am I wrong? ... As I understand it, the version number refers to the functionality not the quality. ------------------------ Regards, Geoff Seath Solutions Ltd (http://www.seathsolutions.com) -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=47564#47564 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users
