> Chonggang Wang wrote:
> > Yes. Baud rate is bit per second. I set 115200 (115.2 Kbps) in my 
> experiment. 
> 
> I got 35 Kbps (bit per second) throughput at receiver side.
> 
>  since 35 is far smaller than 115.2, the bottleneck is not the 
> serial 
> port, it is in air-interface.
> The MAC in the mote that outputs to serial knows the serial rate is 
> 115Kbps, so that could be affecting what it attempts.
In that case, the mote should use the rate (close to baud rate - 115.2 K) to 
forward data to the serial port.

> 
> collisions get retried by the radio-stack and MAC code...  So like 
> Phil 
In this experiment, traffic is one-way and there is no collision. 


> says, backoff explains it, and it is backoff from collisions 
> related to 
> 115kbps top speed....I bet...
I calculated the backoff time and it seems that backoff time is that too much 
to reduce rate heavily. 

I am still confused by the 35 Kbps throughput. 

Thanks,
Chonggang


> John Griessen
> 
> Ecosensory     ecosensory.com
> Austin Texas
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-
> bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
> 
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help

Reply via email to