Tiago - This flag shouldn't be application dependent. When you set the flag at compile time, or adjust the interface and call CC2420Config.sync() at runtime, the address recognition settings should change. With address recognition off, your mote should be receiving packets that are destined for other motes. If this is not the case, let me know and we'll need test it out further.
-David -----Original Message----- From: Tiago Camilo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 4:01 AM To: David Moss Cc: tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] acknowledgements in Tinyos2.0.2 usingBaseStationCC2420, not supported? David, Thanks for your time!! You were right I was using an old version of CC2420ControlP, since I was compiling using the BaseStationCC2420 that incorporates the CC2420ControlP old version. I just simply used the new BaseStation and the ack started to appear... so once again thanks! I notest the flag -DCC2420_NO_ADDRESS_RECOGNITION, on the BaseStation Makefile, does this flag only work on the BaseStation code or can I use on different application using the CC2420ActiveMessageC component? Because I tried with no success. I also tried using the CC2420Config.setAddressRecognition(bool on) through CC2420ControlC, as u suggested in a previous mail. Thanks in advance, Tiago David Moss wrote: > Tiago - > > BaseStationCC2420 was removed in 2.0.2 because it is no longer necessary. > It was originally there because the CC2420ControlP module needed some > special modifications. Now, because those modifications are now controlled > by software and/or preprocessor variables in the 2.0.2 CC2420 stack, > BaseStationCC2420 is deprecated. > > It looks to me like some files in your CC2420 stack are not up to date with > version 2.0.2. Specifically, the CC2420ControlP you're using is old enough > not to incorporate the newest interfaces defined by CC2420Config - that's > where the errors are coming from. If you're 100% sure that your > tos/chips/cc2420 stack is up to date, can you be sure that CC2420ControlP is > not being pulled from some other location? First verify your > tos/chips/cc2420/control/CC2420ControlP provides the interfaces that > CC2420Config is complaining about, and if it does then try adding the > following line to your tos/chips/cc2420/control/CC2420ControlP module: > > #warning "Using the newest CC2420ControlP" > > When you compile, if you see that line printed to the command line at > compile time, you can be sure of which CC2420ControlP file nesC is trying to > use. Attached is the CC2420ControlP you should be using. You can even try > putting that directly in your apps/BaseStation directory to force nesC to > use it instead of some other, older CC2420ControlP. > > -David > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tiago > Camilo > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 7:55 AM > To: tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU > Cc: Philip Levis > Subject: [Tinyos-help] acknowledgements in Tinyos2.0.2 > usingBaseStationCC2420, not supported? > > Hi all, > > I am trying to implement acknowledgementsin my telosb motes, using the > tinyos2.0.2. > I am using the component CC2420ActiveMessageC with the interface > PacketAcknowledgements as suggested in the TestAcks application of > folder cc2420. However i can make this work using the BaseStationCC2420 > application ( tinyos2.0.1). The source does not receive any > acknowledgments from the BaseStation. I found out that in the makefile > there is the declaration: CFLAGS += -DCC2420_NO_ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, which > explains the lack of ack. However when i try to compile > BaseStationCC2420 without this option i have this error: > > compiling BaseStationC to a telosb binary > ncc -o build/telosb/main.exe -Os -O -mdisable-hwmul -Wall -Wshadow > -DDEF_TOS_AM_GROUP=0x7d -Wnesc-all -target=telosb > -fnesc-cfile=build/telosb/app.c -board= -D'TOSH_DATA_LENGTH=102' > -DIDENT_PROGRAM_NAME=\"BaseStationC\" -DIDENT_USER_ID=\"tandre\" > -DIDENT_HOSTNAME=\"homenux\" -DIDENT_USER_HASH=0xb4d39b1cL > -DIDENT_UNIX_TIME=0x46cc4aafL -DIDENT_UID_HASH=0xeb773d58L > BaseStationC.nc -lm > In file included from > /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420/control/CC2420ControlC.nc:53, > from > /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420/csma/CC2420CsmaC.nc:61, > from /opt/tinyos- > 2.x/tos/chips/cc2420/CC2420ActiveMessageC.nc:58, > from > /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/platforms/telosa/ActiveMessageC.nc:61, > from BaseStationC.nc:71: > In component `CC2420ControlP': > CC2420ControlP.nc :236: `CC2420Config.getShortAddr': async mismatch with > declaration > /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420/interfaces/CC2420Config.nc:64: previous > declaration of `CC2420Config.getShortAddr' > CC2420ControlP.nc:244: `CC2420Config.getPanAddr': async mismatch with > declaration > /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420/interfaces/CC2420Config.nc:70: previous > declaration of `CC2420Config.getPanAddr' > CC2420ControlP.nc:76: `CC2420Config.setAutoAck' not implemented > CC2420ControlP.nc:76: `CC2420Config.isAddressRecognitionEnabled' not > implemented > CC2420ControlP.nc:76: `CC2420Config.setAddressRecognition' not implemented > CC2420ControlP.nc:76: `CC2420Config.isAutoAckEnabled' not implemented > CC2420ControlP.nc:76: `CC2420Config.isHwAutoAckDefault' not implemented > In component `CC2420ControlC': > /opt/tinyos-2.x/tos/chips/cc2420/control/CC2420ControlC.nc:98: cannot > find `ActiveMessageAddress' > make: *** [exe0] Error 1 > > I know that the CC2420 stack was changed in this last version. Are we > still waiting for a updated BaseStationCC2420 (since in 2.0.2 cvs it > seems to be deleted), or am I missing something? > > Thanks in advance, > Tiago Camilo > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > Tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU > https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help > _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list Tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU https://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
