On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Michael Schippling wrote:
Yes that makes a lost of sense, logically. It just seems odd, to me, to have a bunch of redundant keywords cluttering up my code when the intent is (almost?) always implicit in the usage... Now, if "signal" actually fired off code in a different interrupt-like context...that would be both logical and reasonable.
Originally, when TinyOS was Perl scripts that munged some cpp macros, there were two macros:
TOS_CALL_COMMAND() TOS_SIGNAL_EVENT() They needed to be distinct because TOS_COMMAND() and TOS_EVENT() led to different names. Phil _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
