I'm not positive, and David would have to verify, I would imagine that
you DON'T want to set the flag -DCC2420_NO_ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS if you set
the flag -DPACKET_LINK
Kevin
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Juan Antonio López Riquelme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank David for your answer.
>
> I have implemented the new version with PacketLink. The messages arrive to
> BaseStation, but wasDelivered failed. I know it because before a new
> iterarion to read the sensors the program sends a message with three
> variables: calls, inputs and dataSendDone. The program adds one to calls
> when it call the fuction to send the data, inputs the same when the
> execution is inside the function to send data and dataSendDone if
> wasDelivery returns true.
>
> For BaseStation I use this Makefile:
> COMPONENT=BaseStationC CFLAGS += -DCC2420_NO_ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CFLAGS +=
> -DCC2420_NO_ADDRESS_RECOGNITION CFLAGS+=-DPACKET_LINK include $(MAKERULES)
> In the Makefile for remote sensor also I added the flag DPACKET_LINK. The
> configuration for remote mote:
> #include <Timer.h> #include "HP2.h" configuration HP2AppC{} implementation
> { ... components CC2420ActiveMessageC; components new
> AMSenderC(AM_MENSAJEDATOS) as EnviarDatos; //Only I use PacketLink with
> thsese messages components new AMSenderC(AM_MENSAJEDATO) as EnviarDato;
> components new AMSenderC(AM_MENSAJEBATERIA) as EnviarAlarma; components new
> AMReceiverC(AM_MENSAJEPERIODO); .. App.Packet -> EnviarDatos; App.AMPacket
> -> EnviarDatos; App.EnviarDatos -> EnviarDatos.AMSend; App.EnviarDato ->
> EnviarDato.AMSend; App.EnviarAlarma -> EnviarAlarma.AMSend; App.AMControl ->
> CC2420ActiveMessageC; App.PacketLink -> CC2420ActiveMessageC; App.Receive ->
> AMReceiverC; ... }
>
> The module:
> //In function to send data ... call PacketLink.setRetries(&PaqueteDatos,
> 10); call PacketLink.setRetryDelay(&PaqueteDatos, 100); if (call
> EnviarDatos.send(0, &PaqueteDatos, sizeof(MensajeDatos)) == SUCCESS) ...
> //sendDone event event void EnviarDatos.sendDone(message_t* msg, error_t
> error) { if (&PaqueteDatos == msg) { enviarDatosBusy =
> FALSE; if (call PacketLink.wasDelivered(msg)) dataSendDone =
> dataSendDone + 1; //The value is always the init value (0).
> //There is a code below and it runs. } }
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Juan Antonio.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Moss
> To: 'Juan Antonio López Riquelme' ; [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:05 PM
> Subject: RE: [Tinyos-help] Problems with ACKs in TinyOS 2.0.2
>
>
>
>
> The functionality you're interested in - reliably link layer transmissions -
> is included in the CC2420 radio stack in the PacketLink interface. You can
> add the PacketLink layer into the radio stack by adding
> CFLAGS+=-DPACKET_LINK into your Makefile. In your software, instead of
> requesting an acknowledgment, setup a reliable packet transmission through
> the PacketLink interface:
>
>
>
> call PacketLink.setRetries(&myMsg, 5);
>
> call PacketLink.setRetryDelay(&myMsg, 0);
>
>
>
> This will automatically retry sending the packet 5 times, with no delays
> between retransmissions. When you get a sendDone() event back, you can
> check to see if the packet was delivered either by calling
> PacketAcknowledgments.wasAcked(&myMsg); OR by calling
> PacketLink.wasDelivered(&myMsg);.
>
>
>
> You are receiving multiple packets at the base station because
> acknowledgments are just as unreliable as sending any packet. If an
> acknowledgement is dropped and you have to retransmit, then the base station
> will receive duplicates. The PacketLink layer, combined with UniqueSend
> and UniqueReceive layers in the CC2420 stack, prevent duplicate packet
> receptions due to dropped acknowledgments. There is more documentation
> here:
> http://tinyos.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/tinyos/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep127.html
>
>
>
> Finally, there is already a delay built into the send for the acknowledgment
> wait period, and you will not get a sendDone() event back until an ack was
> received or the ack wait period timed out.
>
>
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan
> Antonio López Riquelme
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:33 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Tinyos-help] Problems with ACKs in TinyOS 2.0.2
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> I am working with TinyOS 2.0.2 and payload of 29 bytes. Two remotes nodes
> send messages to node with BaseStation application.
>
>
>
>
>
> I changed BaseStation program to work with 29 bytes of payload and
> acknowledgements. I compiled with address 0. In BaseStationP:
>
>
>
>
> #include "AM.h"
>
> #include "Serial.h"
>
> #define TOSH_DATA_LENGTH 29 //Added line
>
> The Makefile:
>
> COMPONENT=BaseStationC
>
> #CFLAGS += -DCC2420_NO_ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
>
> CFLAGS += -DCC2420_NO_ADDRESS_RECOGNITION
>
> include $(MAKERULES)
>
> The remote node requests an ack before to send the message:
>
> call ACK.requestAck(&PaqueteDatos);
>
> if (call EnviarDatos.send(0, &PaqueteDatos, sizeof(MensajeDatos)) ==
> SUCCESS)
>
> And finally the code at sendDone event: event void
> EnviarDatos.sendDone(message_t* msg, error_t error) { if (&PaqueteDatos
> == msg) { enviarDatosBusy = FALSE; enviados = enviados +
> 1; if (!call ACK.wasAcked(msg) && intentos < REINTENTOS) {
> intentos = intentos + 1; FuncionEnviarDatos(); }
> else { //New iteration with the sensors
> intentos = 0; ... } ... } }
>
>
> If the ack failed the program tries to send the message 5 times. At the
> computer sometimes I get the same message twice. Can the program requiere a
> delay between sendDone is signaled and check the acknowledgement?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, Juan Antonio.
> _______________________________________________
> Tinyos-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
>
--
~Kevin
_______________________________________________
Tinyos-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
