Sorry I can't help further. I've used Xmesh with only two nodes (Base and re-Mote) to develop a sensor program so I haven't observed the net construction behavior. I also believe the Xmesh source is not open so you'll probably have to have a go-round with Xbow support.
MS Mohammad S. Hashemian wrote: > I also should include that if I wait for a long time (15 or 30 minutes) > finally the mote becomes the member of the mesh, but this me it sends > the health packet many times instead of once (for example 8 or 10 times) > and therefore moteView shows 10 rows of health packet from this mote > very time. So do you have any idea why this happens? > > 2009/10/14 Mohammad S. Hashemian <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > I monitored the network at most for half an hour, and during this > period I turned some other motes on and off as well. while those > other motes were on, the mote was sending many copies of the health > packets (with different sequence mber, fo example from 180 to 188) > to one of those motes as the destination address instead of bcasting > them (I say this based on details in XSniffer). > > thanks for your answer though > > 2009/10/14 Michael Schippling <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Sounds like the BCASTing mote may not have been allowed > into the mesh-fold yet. I haven't looked at XMESH carefully > but it seems to take a while for nodes to become integrated. > How long have waited for messages? > > MS > > Mohammad S. Hashemian wrote: > > Hi all, > I have two MicaZ nodes and I've installed the same image of > MTS310 XMesh application (from MoteWorks framework) on both. > MoteView can receive and show health packet from one of > them, but not from t other one. When I use XSniffer to sniff > the network, I can see both of the motes send health packets > but one of them send's the packet to the Base as > destination, so the moteView can show it, butthe other one > sends the packet as a broadcast and therefore the MoteViiew > is unable to show it (it might not be the resaon though, but > it's the only difference between the packets these two motes > send). Considering that the sapacket is installed on , doe > anyone have any idea what is the problem? > Thanks, > > -- > Mohammad S. Hashemian > Research Scholar/DISCUS Lab > Department of Computer Science > 254.2 Thorvaldson Building > University of Saskatchewan > (306)966-1947 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tinyos-help mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help > > > > > -- > Mohammad S. Hashemian > Research Scholar/DISCUS Lab > Department of Computer Science > 254.2 Thorvaldson Building > University of Saskatchewan > (306)966-1947 > > > > > -- > Mohammad S. Hashemian > Research Scholar/DISCUS Lab > Department of Computer Science > 254.2 Thorvaldson Building > University of Saskatchewan > (306)966-1947 > _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
