Morning

On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Louis_Schmier wrote:

> Jim, an early good morning.  Can't sleep. What answer is so written in
> stone, so infallible, that it is not subject to questioning, to
> examination, to reconsideration by ourselves of ourselves and by others?

Things like: the earth is round, the earth is more than 7,000
years old, the occipital lobes of the human brain process visual
information, students who actively process information are more
likely to remember the information than students who passively
read it, performance on intelligence tests is correlated with
school success, people who are similar to one another are more
likely to be attracted to one another than people who are
dissimilar, and so on endlessly.  There are many, many things
about the world and human beings that we now know with much
confidence.

> The dynamic of our disciplines is that of constant questioning, constant
> curiosity, constant investigation, constant experimentation, constant
> discovery.  The stagnancy of "It has always been done this way," is
> anathma to that process of learning and growing we all hold so dear. 

The point of questioning, curiosity, etc. is because we want to
know answers to the questions, we want to find out what we don't
know.  There may be some people who are simply satisfied with
constant questioning, and don't care about the answers, but that
somewhat defeats the whole point of questioning.  

If anyone said anything about "it has always been this way" it
certainly wasn't me.  My whole point was that our relatively new
way of examining questions (reason and science) does allow us to
arrive at answers, even if some of them might be tentative until
further evidence is acquired.  Indeed, many of the conflicts in
academic disciplines (evolution vs. creationism, parapsychology,
child-rearing practices, ...) occur because the new answers to
timeless questions are inconsistent with traditional knowledge
and are deemed unacceptable by certain segments of society.  
Perhaps the most fundamental of these conflicts is how we can
come to understand the world better ... science and reason OR the
traditional ways (intuition, religion, cultural practices, ...).

Best wishes
Jim

============================================================================
James M. Clark                          (204) 786-9757
Department of Psychology                (204) 774-4134 Fax
University of Winnipeg                  4L05D
Winnipeg, Manitoba  R3B 2E9             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CANADA                                  http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
============================================================================


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to