Rick Adams wrote:
Then if there really IS no feeling of superiority, justify the
existence of missionaries!
A person who sees him/her-self as not being superior to others
does NOT go into their communities and try to convert them to his/her
belief system in an attempt to "improve" their beliefs. That kind of
behavior is so offensive it justifies Michael Sylvester's tirades
against Eurocentricism--yet it is EXACTLY what both Christian and
Islamic sects have been doing for centuries (and are STILL doing in both
cases).

To which I reply:
I thought someone else might jump on this, but I'm guessing most people
already know to ignore Rick's despicable characterization of missionary
and evangelical activity. In case anyone out there's still reading this
thread and nodding in dazed agreement with Rick, he just doesn't get it.
Suppose I was walking down the street and saw smoke coming from a house.
Acting on my belief that the house was on fire I would knock on the door
and advise the residents to get out. If they didn't believe me, I would
try anything to persuade them. I would argue that there is an ethical
obligation for anyone who believes that the house is on fire to do
anything to persuade the people to get out. What if I'm wrong and the
house isn't on fire? I was acting on my belief out of genuine concern for
the people; so there is still an ethical obligation to act (even if I
might be wrong). Does this behavior classify as "feeling superior"?
Christians simply believe that your house is on fire. The existence of
missionaries is justified by this same concern. A missionary's life is not
a fun one (ask Dayna Curry). When I started writing this message I was
furious with Rick. Now I just feel sorry for him. He's probably spent a
great deal of his life fighting for social justice, etc.; but he's too
blind to see the injustice in his own beliefs. Sad.

AS

Al Shealy, Ph.D.
Dept. of Psychology
Columbia State U.

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to