Hey Jim:  How were your holidays?  Rod

______________________________________________
Roderick D. Hetzel, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Psychology
 LeTourneau University
President-Elect, Division 51
 American Psychological Association
 
Department of Psychology
LeTourneau University
Post Office Box 7001
2100 South Mobberly Avenue
Longview, Texas  75607-7001
 
Office:   Heath-Hardwick Hall 115
Phone:    903-233-3312
Fax:      903-233-3246
Email:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.letu.edu/people/rodhetzel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Guinee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:37 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> Subject: Judge roils wife abuse arena
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> For those of you who teach/cover the subject of domestic 
> violence, this article may interest you.  
> 
> A clear case of blaming the victim?  
> 
> JPG
> 
> Judge's Ruling Roils Arena of Wife Abuse
> 
> January 6, 2002 - - NY Times
> By FRANCIS X. CLINES
> 
> LEXINGTON, Ky., Jan. 4 - The violent arena of domestic
> abuse litigation has grown a bit more volatile here, now
> that a judge has decided to hold two women in contempt of
> court for returning to men accused as their batterers after 
> obtaining emergency orders of protection against them.
> 
> "You can't have it both ways," ruled Judge Megan Lake
> Thornton of Fayette District Court in levying fines of $100
> and $200 in recent weeks against the two women who obtained 
> protection orders but admitted they later relented and returned.
> 
> "It drives me nuts when people just decide to do whatever
> they want," said Judge Thornton, who is experienced in the 
> state's thick domestic abuse docket, which produces close to 
> 30,000 emergency orders of protection a year. State officials 
> describe what they say is a virtual epidemic of abusive 
> relationships in the state.
> 
> Judge Thornton's ruling has alarmed advocates for battered 
> women, who plan to appeal it. The advocates say that the 
> finding goes beyond existing law and is unrealistic because 
> some renewed contacts often prove unavoidable in domestic 
> abuse cases, which involve economic and family dependencies 
> and other complications of daily living.
> 
> The state office on domestic violence has pointedly agreed, 
> warning that the ruling could cause abused women to hesitate 
> in bringing their plight before the courts for fear of being 
> chastised for their trouble.
> 
> "The reality is it's easy to say they should never have 
> contact," said Sherry Currens, executive director of the 
> Kentucky Domestic Violence Association, an advocacy and legal 
> protection group. "But we're talking about people in 
> long-term relationships. They may have children in common. 
> It's pretty hard to say, `Never speak again.' People have 
> financial difficulties. They may love the partner. It's not 
> an easy thing."
> 
> But Judge Thornton declared in court, "When these orders
> are entered, you don't just do whatever you damn well
> please and ignore them."
> 
> The ruling stunned Cindra Walker, the lawyer for the two
> women, who is with Central Kentucky Legal Services, which 
> represents many of the thousands of indigent women in the 
> state caught in abusive relationships.
> 
> "For over five years, I've been in court practically every
> day on these abuse cases, and I've never before had a
> victim threatened with contempt," Ms. Walker said.
> 
> "The domestic violence law is a tool for victims to use to
> be safe," not a device to punish them, she said.
> 
> Judge Thornton's office said she could not comment on the 
> pending cases under judicial rules. But her two rulings made 
> clear that she expected the original protection orders 
> against all contact to apply equally to the person suspected 
> of abuse and the abused.
> 
> "They are orders of the court," the judge declared,
> according to court transcripts obtained by The Lexington 
> Herald-Leader. "People are ordered to follow them, and I 
> don't care which side you're on."
> 
> Carol Jordan, the director of the Governor's Office of
> Child Abuse and Domestic Violence, said she disagreed with 
> Judge Thornton's ruling even as she sympathized with the 
> professionals who must try to oversee violent domestic situations.
> 
> "These are tough cases for judges," Ms. Jordan said. "They
> are dealing with complex human emotions. They are dealing
> with danger."
> 
> But if the ruling stands, Ms. Jordan warned, some abused
> women will conclude that they will not be treated fairly if 
> they ever gain the courage to seek refuge in the courts. This 
> sort of ruling "absolutely increases abused women's level of 
> risk" by seemingly encouraging their abusers, Ms. Jordan said.
> 
> In Kentucky, as in much of the rest of the nation, abuse 
> victims have increasingly turned to the courts in as 
> protection orders have become more accepted, said Billie Lee 
> Dunford-Jackson, assistant director of family violence law 
> and policy for the National Council of Juvenile and Family 
> Court Judges.
> 
> Most judges, but not all, "have been making clear to the 
> batterers that the issue is between the state courts and 
> them," Ms. Dunford- Jackson said, rather than a domestic 
> issue between two parties. A "sizable minority" of judges may 
> still equate the conflicting parties in their rulings, she 
> estimated, but newer state laws have increasingly put the 
> focus on violent abuse as the main problem requiring state protection.
> 
> Ms. Walker's two clients, Jamie Harrison and Robin Hull, 
> declined to be interviewed. "Our big concern now is the 
> chilling effect this will have," said Ms. Walker, one of two 
> legal service lawyers handling hundreds of abuse cases in 17 counties.
> 
> The Kentucky Legislature considered a proposal two years
> ago that would have specified that the orders of protection 
> applied equally to the person accused of abuse as well as the 
> victim, Ms. Jordan noted. But it never passed.
> 
> The notion of mutual protection equating the two parties is
> not now part of state law, Ms. Jordan emphasized. She
> contended that Judge Thornton's ruling, if extended in that 
> direction, would "establish a barrier that stops abused women 
> from seeking protection of the courts."
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to