Stephen's analysis is correct. My initial analysis did not notice the Polish judge's tied marks nor did I know about the presentation superceding the technical merit for the determination of the ordinal. And I am greatly relieved not to have to get into Karl Wuench's question about putative intervals.
Stephen Black concludes: "So what done us in was the tie-breaking rule. And, apparently, a crooked judge (see today's news)." Watch out for the fundamental attribution error! It seems she was a fragile flower who was influenced by powerful people around her. ;-} Rick Dr. Richard L. Froman Psychology Department John Brown University Siloam Springs, AR 72761 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone and voice mail: (479)524-7295 http://www.jbu.edu/sbs/rfroman.html --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
