On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But they do not address how
> common it is for the operation to still be performed.

OK, how about a PubMed search. It turned up a study (appended)
from 1997 reporting beneficial results in a series of 25
pediatric patients. While they don't say in the abstract when the
surgeries were done, their conclusion that they found the
procedure beneficial suggests that it was a group from their
on-going practice.

So, given that epilepsy is uncommon, and that severe epilepsy not
controlled by drugs even rarer, the fact that they found 25
patients to report on suggests that it's a common procedure among
this rare population.

-Stephen

J Neurosurg Sci 1997 Mar;41(1):67-73
Neuropsychological outcome of corpus callosotomy in children and
adolescents.
Lassonde M, Sauerwein C.
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Canada.

The effect of corpus callosotomy on cognitive functioning, social
adjustment and motor behavior was studied in 25 pediatric
patients. In order to assess age-related differences in cerebral
adjustment, the sample was divided into two groups, one group
operated on before and the other after the age of 13 years. Pre-
and postoperative data were collected from all patients by means
of standardized neuropsychological tests. When possible, the
children were also submitted to simple interhemispheric transfer
tasks in the tactile modality. Results revealed that all patients
benefited from the callosotomy, regardless of their age and their
mental capacities at the time of the surgery. The greatest
improvements were observed in social adjustment. Generally,
neuropsychological outcome paralleled neurological outcome. In
keeping with the plasticity hypothesis, the young group showed
greater gains than the older group. The latter showed similar
sequelae as the adult split-brain patients described in the
literature. Number of years of uncontrolled seizures was not
related to neuropsychological outcome. Higher IQ was associated
with better outcome in the young group, mainly because this group
was more severely retarded and had more to gain from the surgery
than the older group. However, mental retardation should not be
an exclusion criterion for corpus callosotomy in view of the
potential benefit of the surgery for the patient and his/her
family.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Black, Ph.D.                      tel: (819) 822-9600 ext 2470
Department of Psychology                  fax: (819) 822-9661
Bishop's University                    e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennoxville, QC
J1M 1Z7
Canada     Department web page at http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
           Check out TIPS listserv for teachers of psychology at:
           http://www.frostburg.edu/dept/psyc/southerly/tips/
------------------------------------------------------------------------


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to