However, in literature and story telling the images were generally
self-generated.  In visual media someone else provides the image.
__________________________
Bill Goss
College of the Rockies
Box 8500
Cranbrook, BC, Canada  V1C 5L7        
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph:  250-489-2751 or 1-877-489-2687 (toll free)



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:29 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: Re: Media and TV


And let's not forget that classic (European) fairy tales are quite bloody
and 
gorey, and I believe that is quite true of most cultures' mythological
stories.

Annette


Quoting David Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Pisacreta, Ph.D. went:
> 
> > If the latest research is 30 years old, its time some people got to
> work.
> 
> I agree with that!
> 
> > The latest playstation kickboxing games, and others, look real as
> > hell to me.  When students tell me that the movie "Ghandi" was
> > boring except for the massacre scene, and my 15 year old comes home
> > a few months ago and tells me that a few of her classmates thought
> > that the images of 9/11 were "cool", an alarm bell goes off. Women
> > fainted when they saw the original Frankenstein with Karloff in the
> > 1930's. Today people watch mass murders, rapes, decapitations,
> > buckets of blood exploding, and eat popcorn at the same time. Don't
> > tell me we're more "sophisticated" today.
> 
> I won't.  Instead, I'll present some literary evidence that children's
> fondness for images of gore was very much apparent in the 1930s (the
> decade you cite).  Here's an excerpt from a poem published by Ogden
> Nash in 1935.  The title is "Don't Cry, Darling, It's Blood All
> Right."
> 
>    ...Hardboiled, sophisticated adults like me and you
>    May enjoy ourselves thoroughly with Little Women and
> Winnie-the-Pooh,
>    But innocent infants these titles from their reading course
>      eliminate
>    As soon as they discover that it was honey and nuts and mashed
>      potatoes instead of human flesh that Winnie-the-Pooh and
>      Little Women ate.
>    Innocent infants have no use for fables about rabbits or donkeys
>      or tortoises or porpoises,
>    What they want is something with plenty of well-mutilated
> corpoises.
>    Not on legends of how the rose came to be a rose instead of a
>      petunia is their fancy fed,
>    But on the inside story of how somebody's bones got ground up
>      to make somebody else's bread.
>    They'll go to sleep listening to the story of the little
>      beggarmaid who got to be queen by being kind to the bees and
>      the birds,
>    But they're all eyes and ears the minute they suspect a wolf
>      or a giant is going to tear some poor woodcutter into
>      quarters or thirds. [...]
> 
> I'm not sure that the children of 1935, as described by Nash, were
> very different from the students you're describing now.  Might they
> not have perked up during the massacre scene in _Gandhi_?  Might they
> not have described the images (not the events, but the images) of
> September 11 as "cool" (or the contemporary equivalent)?
> 
> Someone show me evidence that there's been a change.
> 
> --David Epstein
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



Annette Taylor, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
University of San Diego
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to