Hi Tricia-

I think that you have asked a very important question. In my Methods course
I make a major point of explaining that "no difference" and "did not support
my hypothesis" are NOT the same as "no meaning" and "no value". Two examples
that I use to drive the point home:

1. I hold an eraser above the desk. I hypothesize that if I let go of the
eraser then gravity will cause it to fall toward the earth. I then ask the
class to think about which would be the more interesting finding, a. one
that confirms the hypothesis or b. one that disconfirms the hypothesis.

2. I cite a study of the nutritional analysis of meals prepared by a.
mothers working outside the home and b. stay-at-home mothers. The authors
report that there was no significant difference in the nutritional quality
of the meals. I then ask the class to think about whether such a study would
be of no interest to a working-outside-the-home mother who was feeling
guilty about her conflicting roles.

I think that these examples help students to understand that the data are
ALWAYS meaningful. Personally, I think that it is often the most meaningful
when it disconfirms our hypotheses.

All the best,

-Don.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tricia Keith-Spiegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:15 AM
Subject: Experimental Psychology-Some dangers?


> Hello all,
>
> I have never taught experimental psychology, but I have recently gotten
hold
> of a few articles (thanks to help from a couple of Tipsters, among others)
> suggesting that undergraduate students often make up (or cook or trim)
their
> data rather than actually collecting it.  One professor told me that when
> she made it clear at the onset that the grade was not affected by whether
> the results were "significant" (a term that may also be widely
> misinterpreted by undergraduates), the number of students papers reporting
> statistical significance dropped from almost 100% to less than 50%.
>
> Do any of you think that courses involving the independent collection,
> analysis, and reporting of of data in undergraduate courses can
> MIS-socialize students into what is expected of a responsible scientist?
Do
> you engage in any special lectures or assign any readings to help minimize
> that risk?
>
> I am currently working on a project on responsible conduct of research and
> am very interested in views about how the research process is introduced
to
> students.   I should add that I believe that the undergraduate years is a
> VERY appropriate time for students to begin collecting actual data,
> analyzing, and reporting it because it is the best way to connect them to
> our science.  I think waiting until graduate school is too late (and those
> who do not go on will have never have experienced how their major field of
> study goes about making its discoveries).
>
> Tricia Keith-Spiegel, PhD
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to