Louis makes some excellent points, but I find it hard to believe that
the teacher is the sole person responsible for developing an enriching
and educational environment in the classroom.  Some students are much
more difficult to engage in the classroom or one-on-one in your office.
In fact, some students resist any type of engagement, regardless of what
the professor does or who he or she is as a person.  To suggest that the
professor has the sole responsibility for getting students excited about
learning is similar to saying that a counselor is the sole person
responsible for bringing about change in their clients.  Sure,
counselors can either facilitate or hinder the counseling process or
client motivation, but the client ultimately needs to decide that he or
she wants to make changes.  Similarly, teachers can facilitate or hinder
student motivation, but ultimately the decision rests with the student.

On a similar note, I'm sure the issue of teaching effectiveness and
student response is an empirical question.  What does the research show?
Anyone know?

Rod  
______________________________________________
Roderick D. Hetzel, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
LeTourneau University
Post Office Box 7001
2100 South Mobberly Avenue
Longview, Texas  75607-7001
 
Office:   Education Center 218
Phone:    903-233-3893
Fax:      903-233-3851
Email:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.letu.edu/people/rodhetzel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Louis_Schmier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 5:47 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
> Subject: NY Times Letter
> 
> 
> First, what is our specific training that really prepares us 
> for classroom teaching and public speaking?  Second, to know 
> it doesn't automatically mean you can teach it.  Third, 
> merely speaking, a la lecturing, isn't teaching.  Fourth, if 
> by "entertaining" you mean interesting, sticky, grabbing, 
> contacting, connecting, meaningful, contagious, exciting, and 
> even fun, any presenter must be so.  I will repeat:  the 
> opposite of fun is not work; it's boredom.  A Powerpoint 
> presentation, for example, can be a visual bore no less than 
> a lecture can be an audio bore.  So many of us use that term 
> "entertaining" as a red herring or a straw man to defend what 
> we are doing, to blame others for the ineffectiveness of what 
> we are doing, and for the disinclination to change.
> 
> 
> Make it a good day.
> 
>                                                        --Louis--
> 
> 
> Louis Schmier                            www.therandomthoughts.com
> Department of History                    
> www.halcyon.com/arborhts/louis.html
> Valdosta State University
> 
> Valdosta, Georgia 31698                    /~\    /\ /\
> (229-333-5947)                     /^\    /   \  /  /~ \     /~\__/\
>                                   /   \__/     \/  /     /\ /~      \
>                             /\/\-/ /^\___\______\_______/__/_______/^\
>                           -_~     /  "If you want to climb 
> mountains, \ /^\
>                              _ _ /      don't practice on 
> mole hills" -\____
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to