Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions, 12, 180-184.
You'd have to come up with your own demos, but I don't think that it would be all that difficult. They're fairly emphatic about not wanting you to use the one's at Simon's web page:
http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/djs_lab/demos.html
Hugh
On Mar 23, 2004, at 12:56 PM, Gary Klatsky wrote:
I didn't receive as many responses as I expected to my email that inquired
about cognition labs, there were 4. There may have been one additional
response but I can't seem to locate it
Three people indicated that they selected labs from CogLab. One indicated he
was using ePsych (http://epsych.msstate.edu) and also recommended
PsychExps http://www.olemiss.edu/PsychExps/
Specific recommended labs were Mental Rotation Change Blindness Muller-Lyer Illusion Ponzo Illusion Poggendorf Illusion Stroop Simple vs choice RT Signal Deteciton Bransford & Franks (Laundry) Einstellung (Water Jugs) Spreading activation Prototypes Visual search Scanning STM Lexical Decisions Depth of processing Brooks Brooks (selective interference of imagery) Categorical perception of speech.
The reason for my question was that I am currently constructing a series of
lab exercises using Eprime and wanted to see if there were other exercises
that I may have been overlooking
My list currently includes Configural Superiority (Pomerantz, Sager & Stoever) Depth of processing Face recognition (retroactive interference) False memories (Roediger & McDermott) Generation Effect (Slamecka) Local vs Global precedances (Navon) Hemispheric Differences (word vs picture recognition) Mental Rotation Perceptual Matching (Posner) Popout Parallel processing of multielemental displays (Egeth) RT experiements (comparison of simple, go no-go, choice and sr comptatability) Scanning STM Selective Attention (Erikson & Erikson) Serial Position Signal detection Spatial Cuing (Posner) STM Decay (Brown, Peterson) Visual Search (Treisman & Gelade) Word Superiority
I am also thinking of a subliminal cuing experiment and will likely include
some variation of Stroop
I had been happy with CogLab. Many of the details needed by students to
write those labs were missing from the lab manual. Using Eprime will also
let the class suggest changes to the design that I can implement for the
class.
Thanks to those of you who responded.
Gary
Gary J. Klatsky, Ph. D. Director, Human Computer Interaction M.A. Program
Department of Psychology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oswego State University (SUNY) http://www.oswego.edu/~klatsky 7060 State Hwy 104W Voice: (315) 312-3474 Oswego, NY 13126 Fax: (315) 312-6330
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------ Hugh J. Foley Professor Department of Psychology Skidmore College Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 518-580-5308 http://www.skidmore.edu/~hfoley ------------------------------------------------
--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
