|
This is a metanalysis of past research I take it? Rosenthal had an
article in (I think) _Psychological Methods_ recently about how to
convert t-tests into r-equivalent effect size measures (based on a talk
I saw him give at APA a couple of years back). It's as reasonablea
thing to do as r is a reasonable statistic. I'd have to know the knid
of data they're converting to know for certain, but my suspicion is
that r would tend to underestimate effects because it is sensitive to
the linearity of the relationship (i.e., it misses non-linear
relationships) and it tends to be depressed by restricted ranges (i.e.,
less than 9 or so *used* scale values). Regards, -- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3 Canada office: 416-736-5115 ext. 66164 fax: 416-736-5814 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ .================================== don allen wrote:
--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Media violence don allen
- Re: Media violence Mark A. Casteel
- Re: Media violence David Epstein
- RE: Media violence Christopher D. Green
- RE: Media violence Rick Froman
- Re: Media violence Mark A. Casteel
