|
(I'm leaving the original offering of this from
Rory McElwee, but following the excellent advice of a TIPSter requesting that we
remove as much extraneous listing as possible, I eliminated the original request
for an April Fool's activity.)
Just FYI, this got its greatest publicity
as the science project of a student named Nathan Zohner, in Idaho
Falls. Here's the usual carefully investigated information from
snopes.com, the Urban Legend debunker website:
In
about "the dangers of dihyrogen monoxide" to
fifty ninth-grade students and asking them what (if anything) should be done
about the chemical. Forty-three students favored banning it, six were undecided,
and only one correctly recognized that 'dihydrogen monoxide' is actually
H2O � plain old water. Zohner's analysis of the results he obtained
won him first prize in the Greater Idaho Falls Science Fair; garnered him scads
of attention from newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations, universities,
and congresspeople; and prompted the usual round of outcries about how our
ignorant citizenry doesn't read critically and can be easily misled. In other
words, a tempest in a teapot.
Zohner's project wasn't original: spoof petitions about dihydrogen monoxide and other innocuous "dangers" have been circulating for years, and Zohner based his project on a bogus report that was already making the rounds of the Internet. Moreover, Zohner's target audience was ninth-graders, a group highly susceptible to allowing peer pressure to overwhelm critical thinking. Thrust any piece of paper at the average high school student with a suggestion about what the "correct" response to it should be, and peer pressure pretty much assures you'll get the answer you're looking for. Someone that age isn't very likely to read a friend's petition calling for the banning of whale hunting and critically evaluate the socio-economic and environmental impact of such a regulation. Instead, he's probably going to say to himself, "This issue is obviously important to my friend, and he must have some good reasons for circulating the petition, so I'll sign it." That said, this example does aptly demonstrate the kind
of fallacious reasoning that's thrust at us every day under the guise of
"important information": how with a little effort, even the most innocuous of
substances can be made to sound like a dangerous threat to human life. The next
time you receive an ominous message such as the one warning you that sodium lauryl
sulfate (a common foaming ingredient used in shampoos) causes cancer,
with the "proof" being that this caustic chemical is also used to scrub garage
floors, keep in mind that the very same thing could be said of another
ubiquitous cleaning Update: In March 2004 the
California municipality of Aliso Viejo (a suburb in Orange County) came within a
cat's whisker of falling for this hoax after a paralegal there convinced city
officials of the danger posed by this chemical. The leg-pull got so far as a
vote having been scheduled for the City Council on a proposed law that would
have banned the use of foam containers at city-sponsored events because (among
other things) they were made with DHMO, a substance that could "threaten human
health and safety." --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- April Fools? Lenore Frigo
- Re: April Fools? James D.Dougan
- Re: April Fools? sblack
- Re: April Fools? Annette Taylor, Ph. D.
- Re: April Fools? Rory McElwee
- Beth Benoit
about "the dangers of dihyrogen monoxide" to
fifty ninth-grade students and asking them what (if anything) should be done
about the chemical. Forty-three students favored banning it, six were undecided,
and only one correctly recognized that 'dihydrogen monoxide' is actually
H2O � plain old water. Zohner's analysis of the results he obtained
won him first prize in the Greater Idaho Falls Science Fair; garnered him scads
of attention from newspapers, magazines, radio and TV stations, universities,
and congresspeople; and prompted the usual round of outcries about how our
ignorant citizenry doesn't read critically and can be easily misled. In other
words, a tempest in a teapot.
