Fascinating. I can see how a visual inspection of a brace could be done without removing it, but shoes? Please excuse my ignorance/insensitivity if I don't understand the potential problems here.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/23/04 2:16:43 PM >>> The reference was to this page on the TSA's website: http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/editorial/editorial_1571.xml. Rick Rick Froman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Michael Scoles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 12:57 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences Subject: Re: Terror in the Skies (Was: More on profiling) >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/23/04 11:35:40 AM >>> A loose end on this thread: she makes a few specific claims which I find disturbing, and which should be readily verifiable if true. These are: 2) Passengers wearing orthopedic shoes are excused from having to take their shoes off for examination *----------- Excusing those with orthopedic shoes seems unlikley. I once followed a well-known psychologist through security following a convention. This was *long* before 9/11. He wore a leg brace, which set off the metal detector. Security pulled him aside for a more thorough search. His disability was more obvious than one which might require wearing orthopedic shoes. Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D. Interim Chair, Dept. Psychology & Counseling University of Central Arkansas Conway, AR 72035 --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
