Phil: Can you send us a complete reference. I'd like to read the article but a quick psychinfo didn't yield anything for me :-(
And no, I personally don't know abut the Follow Through Project Anentte Quoting Philippe Gervaix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > A recent report from Canada "Which pedagogies are efficient?" by > Gauthier C., Mellouki M. & al. is crossing the Ocean and being > abundantly debated here in Switzerland and in France. > In this literature survey, they compare different researches that > examine the efficiency of different pedagogical methods. Some of their > conclusions are based on the Follow Through Project that compared > schools that used "curriculum based learning" vs "learner-centered > methods": The report concludes that Direct instruction Methods > (curriculum based learning) do better than constructivist methods > (learner-centered methods). > > Can anyone tell me more about the Follow Through Evaluation Project? > Who is behind it? How solid are their methods? What exactly do we have > to understand by" Direct Instruction" model? How are these questions > debated overseas? > Thanks > Phil Gervaix > Gymnase de Burier > Switzerland > > For those who read French: > http://www.fondapol.org/pdf/Pedagogies_efficaces.pdf > http://www.fondapol.org/actualite3.jsp > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D. Department of Psychology University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego, CA 92110 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
