michael sylvester wrote:
A correlation is good enough for me.Correlation does not necessary mean
causation,but it sure indicates an influence.
What else do you need?Let us not forget interaction.
The good thing about correlation is that it may assume a multiplicity of
factors whereas causation is restrictive.
This is wrong in so many ways I can hardly begin to specify them. As
long as I can deter anyone else from being influenced by this set of
spurious claims, I'll be satisfied.
Regards,
--
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo
Office: 416-736-5115 ext. 66164
Fax: 416-736-5814
=========================
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
