Methinks we've been Michaeled again. Sigh. d David K. Hogberg, PhD Professor of Psychology, Emeritus Albion College, Albion MI 49224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] home phone: 517/629-4834 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/08/06 1:09 PM >>> I don't know why I bother... but here goes.
What does "Let us not forget interaction" mean? I would suggest that rather than causation being "restrictive", it is more accurate to say causation is "precise" (perhaps). Do you teach research methods or statistics Michael? On Mar 8, 2006, at 12:54 PM, michael sylvester wrote: > A correlation is good enough for me.Correlation does not necessary > mean causation,but it sure indicates an influence. > What else do you need?Let us not forget interaction. > The good thing about correlation is that it may assume a multiplicity > of factors whereas causation is restrictive. > > Michael J.Sylvester,PhD > Daytona Beach,Florida > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Sent via FalconMail e-mail system at falconmail.dbcc.edu > > > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ======================================================== Steven M. Specht, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology Utica College Utica, NY 13502 (315) 792-3171 "Mice may be called large or small, and so may elephants, and it is quite understandable when someone says it was a large mouse that ran up the trunk of a small elephant" (S. S. Stevens, 1958) --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
