Rick,
That's exactly what I do... and for that reason. I was a reviewer for Garvetter and Wallnau for years and suggested that that strategy makes it much easier for students to distinguish between the two (otherwise they ask "why are there two formula for standard deviation"?). I think it helps students' comprehension to separate them.
Good luck with it all.
Cheers,
-S

On Sep 6, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Rick Froman wrote:

It is helpful to see the connection between the N-1 in the s denominator and the concept of degrees of freedom. I don't usually discuss degrees of freedom (using a similar exercise but I think I will try Steven's idea) until we get to inferential stats. Of course the s is inferential in that it is used to estimate the sample mean. I wonder if it would be a good idea to just introduce population variance and st dev in the descriptive part of the course and introduce s and s squared later when inferential statistics (and concepts like degrees of freedom are being introduced)? I don't think I have ever seen a text book do that. Do any of you do that?

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman
Psychology Department
Box 3055
John Brown University
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
(479) 524-7295
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Pete, it's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"
- Ulysses Everett McGill

________________________________

From: Steven Specht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 9/6/2006 10:37 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Laurence Roberts; Arlene Lunquist; Della Ferguson; Elise Pepin Pepin
Subject: [tips] Re: Question from a student


Rick,
Briefly (and I can elaborate if needed), the N-1 "formula" is also referred to as the degrees of freedom and is derived from the fact that given any set of numbers, if you assume (and it is a "strong" assumption) that the best single value guess for an unknown population mean is given by the mean of that sample, then what remains to infer about is the variability of the data set. So, for example, two data sets can have the same mean but different variabilities (of course). Let's say you have a data set with 5 numbers in it and calculate a particular mean. This would be the inferred mean of the unknown population from which the sample was taken. Now you need to make a guess at the variability. If you start "making up" numbers which might comprised a sample of five (BUT HAVE AS YOUR LIMITATION THE ORIGINAL INFERRED MEAN), you can make up any four numbers (they are free to vary)... after which the fifth number is dictated (given the values of the other four and retaining the inferred mean). If it was a theoretical group of 23 numbers, 22 would be "free to vary" and the last would be dictated by the other 22. Therefore N-1 = degrees of freedom. I know this might not be as clear as I could do the explanation given more time (maybe I should work up a good one). Try this exercise in class. Make up a sample mean from, let's say, a sample of 7 unkown scores. Ask aone student to provide a potential single score; "Can this be one of the scores and still have a sample mean of whatever it is that you made up"? "Yes".... keep going one-by-one. You'll find that the answer is "yes" everytime, except for the last number which is then mathematically "restricted"/dictated by the previous 6. Viola, degrees of freedom (N-1). It's not as arbitrary as it seems to students.
Hope this helps.
-S


On Sep 6, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Rick Froman wrote:


        I hope that subject line isn't copyrighted.

        

After I explained why the formula for the s to predict s uses N-1 in the denominator (to inflate it for a more conservative estimate since it is just an estimate of the population standard deviation), a student asked, why N-1 and not N-2 or N-3? I mentioned statistical studies about how N-1 gives the best estimate of the population standard deviation but I wonder if anyone has a good explanation for why it is N-1. I know if the number got too high, small sample sizes would end up with a negative number (which would make no sense).

        

        Rick

        

        

        Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
        Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
        Professor of Psychology
        John Brown University
        2000 W. University
        Siloam Springs, AR  72761
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        (479) 524-7295
        http://www.jbu.edu/academics/hss/psych/faculty.asp

"Pete, it's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart."
        - Ulysses Everett McGill



        
        ---
        To make changes to your subscription go to:

http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english



========================================================
Steven M. Specht, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
Utica College
Utica, NY 13502
(315) 792-3171

"Mice may be called large or small, and so may elephants, and it is quite understandable when someone says it was a large mouse that ran up the trunk of a small elephant" (S. S. Stevens, 1958)
<winmail.dat>---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english




========================================================
Steven M. Specht, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
Utica College
Utica, NY 13502
(315) 792-3171

"Mice may be called large or small, and so may elephants, and it is quite understandable when someone says it was a large mouse that ran up the trunk of a small elephant" (S. S. Stevens, 1958)


---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to