|
Points all well taken - the evidence is hardly perfect and mostly
correlational. But that doesn't mean that it is not true. Asking kids
what influenced their decisions to smoke (or not) is not
"incontrovertible evidence" but it is also not irrelevant or useless.
Just because their answers might seem to correspond to what "everyone
thinks" doesn't mean that it is not what in fact influenced them. So a
researcher who doubts these findings should do research to counter it.
Perhaps a study showing that kids think that they are influenced by
their parents' smoking attitudes but they are really not (that would be
an important and interesting study). As is always the case with scientific progress (such as it is) it is the disbelievers who must prove something is different from what the prevailing scientific knowledge at the time. So where is the (high quality) evidence that adult modeling of smoking (independent of genetics) is irrelevant in predicting smoking onset? Marie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4 Dec 2006 at 9:01, Marie Helweg-Larsen wrote: -- ********************************************* Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology Dickinson College, P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 Office: (717) 245-1562, Fax: (717) 245-1971 Webpage: www.dickinson.edu/~helwegm *********************************************--- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english |
- [tips] Re: Stopping smoking Marie Helweg-Larsen
- [tips] Re: Stopping smoking Paul Okami
- [tips] Re: Stopping smoking Marie Helweg-Larsen
- [tips] Re: Stopping smoking Paul Okami
- [tips] Re: Stopping smoking sblack
- [tips] Re: Stopping smoking Marie Helweg-Larsen
