I hope Ill be allowed beyond my quota to make a correction to my previous message in this thread. I implicitly misquoted Paul when I wrote:
"The idea that a meta-analysis published in 1998 of studies of the efficacy of antidepressants is 'old news' is an interesting notion, but hardly one to be taken seriously." In fact Paul wrote that *critiques* of the Kirsch & Saperstein 1998 meta-analysis are "old news", which, given that they contend that Kirsch et al's methodological procedures are fundamentally flawed, can hardly dismissed as old hat. So my verdict on this point in my previous message still holds. Allen E. --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
