Because it's not about Kubler-Ross anymore. It is about the value of judgements based on "clinical experience" in the absence of empirical data. This is an issue that has turned psychologists into "cognitive scientists", "neuroscientists", "behavioral biologists", etc. There is still so much "what I discover from my clients" B.S., tainted with the therapists own religious beliefs and emotional baggage (or is it "unfinished business"), that will forever condemn clinical psychology to the status of faith healing.
Michael T. Scoles, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology & Counseling University of Central Arkansas Conway, AR 72035 501-450-5418 >>> Harzem Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/09/07 5:01 PM >>> Dear friends and colleagues, Why don't we give Kubler-Ross a much deserved respite? Peter Peter Harzem, B.Sc.(Lond.), Ph.D.(Wales) Hudson Professor Emeritus Department of Psychology Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849-5214 USA Phone: +334 844-6482 Fax: +334 844-4447 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
