Hi

As one of the promoters of antiscientific views, I think Rorty, among many 
others, certainly had negative influence, both direct and indirect, on efforts 
to promote the human or social sciences, including psychology.  Here's an 
excerpt from the obituary Chris linked us to.

"His work redefined knowledge 'as a matter of conversation and of social 
practice, rather than as an attempt to mirror nature' and thus redefined 
philosophy itself as an unending, democratically disciplined, social and 
cultural activity of inquiry, reflection, and exchange, rather than an activity 
governed and validated by the concept of objective, extramental truth." 

Take care
Jim

James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> "Christopher D. Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10-Jun-07 1:35:50 PM >>>
Richard Rorty passed away from pancreatic cancer on June 8 at the age of 76.
I am not sure precisely what his death has to do with the teaching of 
psychology, but the passing of so controversial and influential an 
intellectual figure -- the leading pragmatist of his era -- can hardly 
go unnoticed.

The first of what will certainly be many obituaries can be found on the 
/Telos/ website:
http://tinyurl.com/33h2qv 

Regards,
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

 

416-736-5115 ex. 66164
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ 
======================================

 

 

 

 



---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english 



---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english

Reply via email to