OK, very sad. Curious if anyone knows if APS had taken any official position on this issue? I have to admit I'm now quite proud to be a member of APS as opposed to the APA. But then the APA didn't want me as I don't have a PhD (classic, ABD). Right from the get-go, APS decided to have no concern with status (i.e., not requiring different colored badges based on your status as per APA conventions), welcomed full membership to all instructors of psychology from the high school level on up, etc. Of course, their main goal was to encourage the field of psychology to become more rigorous/scientific as the APA was being taken over by the clinicians who tend to not understand the criteria and methods required for rigorous scientific conclusions.
This is getting very personal but can't help but be curious how many of you who are members of APA have written letters and/or left this organization due to the quite negative perspective they have given to all of us who practice in the field of psychology. Unfortunately, the media only knows about the APA versus APS, at least that's my general impression. Joan [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Harper's take on the APA torture debate: > http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/08/hbc-90001045 > Chris > -- > > Christopher D. Green > Department of Psychology > York University > Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 > Canada > > > > 416-736-5115 ex. 66164 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ > ====================================== > > > > > > > > > > > --- ---
