This reminds me of the Olds/Milner experiments where rats would cross an electrical grid in order to get brain stimulation.
Addicts will try just as hard to get their rewards despite pre- and-post painful factors.
Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [tips] Dogs, Porcupines, and Learning theories
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:16:31 EDT
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
Addicts will try just as hard to get their rewards despite pre- and-post painful factors.
Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [tips] Dogs, Porcupines, and Learning theories
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:16:31 EDT
This discussion brings to mind why people continue to smoke even after it
harms their bodies, e.g. with a smoker's cough or emphysema. You can
address this as addiction, but, for me, one of the simplest explanations is that
the immediate primary positive reinforcement is much more powerful than the
delayed primary punishment. This might be true for the dogs as well. The
immediate primary positive reinforcement of the chase and capture might outway
the pain associated with the punishing quills or skunk scent, which is delayed
when compared to the initiation of the chase.
Riki Koenigsberg
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
---
To make changes to your subscription go to:
http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
--- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
