I can't point you to any literature regarding potential confounds, but on the 
face of it, it seems to me that if she's using two separate open-ended 
instruments pre vs. post, there's no way to assess change, so what would be the 
point of doing the research?

And I'm with Mark- your IRB has gone way beyond their function. I'd be furious 
if our IRB did something like this.


-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Specht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 10/14/2007 8:48 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] IRB
 
Dear TIPsters,
Argh! I need some help. A colleague of mine submitted a study for 
approval by our IRB. She proposed a pre-/post- design to assess 
students' attitudes before and after a particular chemistry lab 
experience. I can provide more detail if necessary, but the point is 
fairly straight-forward. The IRB rejected her proposal and told her 
that she should use a different assessment instrument before (i.e., 
pre-) and after (i.e., post-). They also told her that instead of a 
Likert scale, she should use open-ended questions.
#1 - Changing the assessment tool from pre- to post- certainly 
introduces a serious confounding variable, imho
#2 - Although an open-ended (qualitative?) assessment might be useful, 
there is nothing wrong with asking the same questions using Likert 
scales (and shouldn't this be a decision that the researcher makes?

With regard to concern #1, I am having a bit of difficulty finding 
information specifically which addresses this issue (since it is so 
fundamental, in terms of confounding). Does anyone have any specific 
information from a source which indicates that the same instrument 
should be used to avoid confounding the research?

Thank you.

-S


========================================================
Steven M. Specht, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Psychology
Utica College
Utica, NY 13502
(315) 792-3171

"Mice may be called large or small, and so may elephants, and it is 
quite understandable when someone says it was a large mouse that ran up 
the trunk of a small elephant" (S. S. Stevens, 1958)

---


---

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to