Google is a search engine, not a source, so how can you cite it?
Category error!
Simply apply the same standards for references that you would apply 
to any other citation.
Besides, how do you know whether a student found an American 
Psychologist article through Google, Google Scholar, PsychLit, or 
walking through the stacks?

At 8:01 AM -0600 1/14/08, Christopher D. Green wrote:
>  >From today's Inside Higher Ed:
>
>Some professors 
><http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/01/26/wiki>ban their 
>students from citing Wikipedia in papers. Tara Brabazon of the 
>University of Brighton, bars her students from using not only 
>Wikipedia, but Google as well, 
><http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article3182091.ece>The
> 
>Times of London reported. Google is "white bread for the mind," 
>Brabazon said. "Google offers easy answers to difficult questions. 
>But students do not know how to tell if they come from serious, 
>refereed work or are merely composed of shallow ideas, superficial 
>surfing and fleeting commitments," she said. "Google is filling, but 
>it does not necessarily offer nutritional content."
>
>Next they'll be requiring students to use quills and ink bottles too. :-)
>
>Chris
>
>--
>Christopher D p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 16.0px 
>Times New Roman} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 16.0px 
>Times New Roman; min-height: 18.0px} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
>0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica} span.s1 {font: 16.0px Lucida Grande}
>
>Christopher D. Green
>Department of Psychology
>York University
>Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
>Canada
>
>
>
>416-736-2100 ex. 66164
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
><http://www.yorku.ca/christo/>http://www.yorku.ca/christo/
>
>
>
>"Part of respecting another person is taking the time to criticise 
>his or her views."
>
>    - Melissa Lane, in a Guardian obituary for philosopher Peter Lipton
>
>=================================
>
>
>---
>To make changes to your subscription contact:
>
>Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that
people believe in it.

* PAUL K. BRANDON                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* Psychology Dept               Minnesota State University  *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001     ph 507-389-6217  *
*             http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~pkbrando/            *
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to