Given the one example Beth provided, it seems like the response could easily be 
explained by different amounts of exertion used in pushing or pulling become 
associated (through classical conditioning) with the visual stimuli. I guess 
more examples and how the concept would differ from traditional psychological 
ideas of association would be helpful.



Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
John Brown University
2000 W. University
Siloam Springs, AR  72761
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(479) 524-7295
http://www.jbu.edu/academics/hss/faculty/rfroman.asp



"Pete, it's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart."
- Ulysses Everett McGill


________________________________
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:03:11 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [tips] Embodied cognition


Always a little skeptical of the "newest in psychology," I came across this 
article on the front page of the Boston Globe's Ideas section on Sunday:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/01/13/dont_just_stand_there_think/

It's about "embodied cognition" and claims that "a growing body of new research 
suggests" that physical movement is linked to cognition in a variety of ways.  
For example, "...a study...found that subjcts (all non-Chinese speakers) shown 
a series of Chinese ideographs while either pushing down or pulling up on a 
table in front of them will say they prefer the ideographs they saw when 
pulling upward over the ones they saw while pushing downward."  An interesting 
thought, but I can't help but wonder if it's just the newest fad. (Should I be 
jumping up and down while writing that?)

A search of the literature turned up 92 articles on "embodied cognition."  Many 
seemed a bit obscure, such as:
An embodied cognitive analysis of social 
situativity.<http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/viewarticle?data=dGJyMPPp44rp2/dV0%2bnjisfk5Ie44ud%2b4%2bLthuWk63nn5Kx95uXxjL6nrUmypbBIrq6eSa6wsk%2b4p684v8OkjPDX7Ivf2fKB7eTnfLunr0%2b3qq5ItKy2PurX7H%2b72%2bw%2b4ti7iPHv5j7y1%2bVVv8SkeeyzsEiuq6tRt6avTaumr0ik3O2K69fyVeTr6oTy2/aM&hid=15>
  Clark, Kevin Michael; Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: 
Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol 66(2-A), 2005. pp. 486.  And
At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets 
neurophysiology.<http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/viewarticle?data=dGJyMPPp44rp2/dV0%2bnjisfk5Ie44ud%2b4%2bLthuWk63nn5Kx95uXxjL6nrUmypbBIrq6eSa6wsk%2b4p684v8OkjPDX7Ivf2fKB7eTnfLunr0%2b3qq5ItKy2PurX7H%2b72%2bw%2b4ti7iPHv5j7y1%2bVVv8SkeeyzsEiuqqtJt6uvUKumr0qk3O2K69fyVeTr6oTy2/aM&hid=15>
  Garbarini, Francesca; Adenzato, Mauro; Brain and Cognition, Vol 56(1), Oct 
2004. pp. 100-106. [Journal Article]

There were also several that were skeptical of the whole thing.  None of the 
textbooks I use for Human Development, Child Psychology or Social Psychology 
include the concept, but I don't teach a brain or cognition course, so perhaps 
they do include this.

Anybody have any insight into this topic?

Beth Benoit
Granite State College
Plymouth State University
New Hampshire

---

To make changes to your subscription contact:



Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

________________________________
Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista(r) + Windows Live(tm). 
Start 
now!<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008>

---

To make changes to your subscription contact:



Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to