I think that's exactly right, Hugh.  If you watch orthographic
projections of a rotating object, the sign of depth is ambiguous, and
often those will spontaneously switch the direction of rotation.  E.g.,
if the leftward-moving dots are perceived as if on the front surface,
you get one direction of rotation; if on the back, the opposite.  After
watching for a while, you can get reversals.

The same ambiguity is operating here: if you perceive the leg as coming
out of the plane toward you, then you get one direction of rotation; if
the other, the other.

m


------
"There is no power for change greater than a community discovering what
it cares about."
--
Margaret Wheatley 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hugh Foley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:35 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Never Seen This One Before


I don't think that there is a single/simple explanation. However, my
preference is to think of it as an example of the hypothesis-testing
nature of perception. That is, many stimuli are open to multiple
interpretations (e.g., multistable images, such as Rubin's face/vase
illusion or the old lady/young girl figure). When faced with such
ambiguity, our visual systems don't seize and hold a single
interpretation, but continue to try out alternative explanations--which
will often cause a change in interpretation. I think that anyone who
looks at that rotating figure long enough will see a shift in direction
of rotation. You can find other examples, such as the rotating ferris
wheel. 

http://www.skidmore.edu/%7Ehfoley/PercLabs/Color&Motion.htm

<scroll down to the bottom of #12>

There was also a neat example provided by Gilbert, S. (1991) A new
kinetic depth illusion..., ToP, 18, 55-56. With a simple BASIC program,
Gilbert showed how you could get an illusion of depth, but then the
helix-like structure would reverse direction of rotation as you watched
it. Cool stuff!

Hugh

On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Larry Daily wrote:


        
        
        Friends,
         
        One of my colleagues here forwarded the attached image file to
me and asked if I could explain why the dancer is sometimes seen as
spinning to the left and sometimes to the right. I don't buy the left
brain/right  explanation that came with it, but I have no real idea why
it works. Can anyone help me out?
         
        Thanks,
        Larry
         
        ************************************************************
        Larry Z. Daily
        Associate Professor of Psychology
        Psychology Department Chair
        
        Department of Psychology
        White Hall, Room 216
        Shepherd University
        Shepherdstown, West Virginia 25443
        
        Psychology phone: (304) 876-5297
        
        email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        WWW: http://webpages.shepherd.edu/LDAILY/index.html
        
        Adam's prize was open eyes
        His sentence was to see
                              - The Dreamer
                              - Tom Rush
        
        
        

        
        


--------------------------------------------------
Hugh J. Foley
Department of Psychology
Skidmore College
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
518-580-5308
http://www.skidmore.edu/~hfoley
--------------------------------------------------
"And I still don't know if I'm a falcon, a storm, or an unfinished
song." Rilke
--------------------------------------------------




---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to