On 21 April 2008 Michael Sylvester wrote: > Do we consider Farley Mowat, Diane Forsee, and Robert >Ardrey in the same class as those Europeans like Goodal, >Eibl-Eibesfeldet (sp), Hans Haas, and Loremz and others? >It would appear that the North Americans were not considered >as serious ethologists as the Europeans. Any reasons for that?
First, Robert Ardrey was not an ethologist. Second, I had to check out Farley Mowat online, and it seems he was a conservationist rather than an ethologist (I'm open to correction on that). Third, as far as I'm aware, Diane Fosse is well regarded as an ethologist. Allen Esterson Former lecturer, Science Department Southwark College, London http://www.esterson.org --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
