Dear Colleagues,

Louis Schmier wrote:
>
>
> Uncontrolled science, like anything that is uncontrolled and carried 
> to its extreme, is a bad that often outweighs its good.  Like it or 
> not, the likes of Mengele and those involved in the T-4 project and 
> those engaged in the high altitude experiments and those engaged in 
> medical experiments said justified themselves by arguing that  "in the 
> name of science" created its own moral and ethical code, and that the 
> quest for knowledge about life justifies the means even if it means 
> taking life. 
>

Blaming science for the actions of individuals (e.g., Mengele, Rascher, 
Clauberg, Oberhauser, etc.) guided by a destructive, and non-scientific, 
ideology (racial hygiene) is like blaming medicine should a drug be used 
to kill as opposed to heal. 

We would do better to focus our attention on understanding the 
development and sustainability of malevolent ideologies (e.g., 
religious, political, pseudo-scientific, etc.) and their role in 
destructive aggression than simply looking for oversimplified, and 
largely politicized, answers.

To Peace,

Linda


-- 
Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
Professor, Psychology and International Human Rights
Past-President, Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, & Violence 
(Div. 48, APA) <http://www.peacepsych.org>
Steering Committee, Psychologists for Social Responsibility (PsySR) 
<http://www.psysr.org>
Secretary, Raphael Lemkin Award Committee, Institute for the Study of 
Genocide <http://www.instituteforthestudyofgenocide.org/>
Webster University
470 East Lockwood
St. Louis, MO  63119

Main Webpage:  http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/ 
<http://www.webster.edu/%7Ewoolflm/> 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's (and woman's) best friend. . . .
Inside a dog, it's too dark to read."
                  -             Groucho Marx

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to