Jim Clark wrote:
JC: Ken, did you plug the observed values into the formula for correction to see how well it reproduced the .80? My suspicion is that the adjustment would at least be "technically" correct in this sense, although more subjects in the simulation might have made agreement even more likely.
NO, I haven't tried that yet. I will do so. The conversion formula in R & R looks pretty straightforward. Regards, Ken -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor Department of Psychology http://www.psych.appstate.edu Appalachian State University Boone, NC 28608 USA --------------------------------------------------------------- --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
