Michael (Smith) And if that is your dissertation wouldn't that make you a York U. PhD? :)
Kant certainly did reflect on the "Limits to pure reason" but that is also a rather idiomatic translation of "Pure reason", if my reading of philosophy or German can be at all trusted. Surely you aren't suggesting that clinical psychology should somehow return to a practice based on the categorical imperative or retreat to skeptical rationalism? If so that seems to fly in the face of the tenets of the Boulder training model and about 60+ years of history in psychology and 125+ years in philosophy of science. Kant is hardly held up as the source to read to understand modern psychological or scientific practice (CPR was first published, if memory serves, in 1871?) Tim _______________________________ Timothy O. Shearon, PhD Professor and Chair Department of Psychology The College of Idaho Caldwell, ID 83605 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] teaching: intro to neuropsychology; psychopharmacology; general; history and systems "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." Dorothy Parker On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:44:33 -0700, Michael Smith wrote: >I don't respond much on TIPS but read most of the stuff. >My Ph.D. was in computational neuroscience (eye movement control) >through psychology. --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
<<winmail.dat>>
