One reason might be that Flynn's observations are restricted to one
specific situation, whereas Skinner's have been shown to generalize
across situations.
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Christopher D. Green wrote:
Why would these be "laws" and, say, the graphs associated with
Skinner's
schedules of reinforcement, not be? Why are these "laws" and Flynn's
discoveries about the rise in intelligence an "effect"? (an
"effect" of
what? time?)
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
