I don't think Psychology is hard (meaning difficult to grasp). For some reason 
the students that I have had seem to conflate what is hard (conceptually 
difficult to understand) with what requires work.

I don't think there is anything conceptually difficult in psych, but it does 
require work.

One student in my methods class bemoaned the fact that he took psychology 
because there was no math in it, only to find he had to learn statistics! The 
only hard part in psych may be statistics depending on how far you want to go 
with it. But then again, a theoretical mathematician friend told me there was 
nothing conceptually difficult about statistics, it just required a lot of work!

--Mike

--- On Wed, 8/27/08, William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: William Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [tips] why psychology is hard
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 2:47 PM

Mike,

I sent the same correction. My source was Thomas Szasz, personal communication,
which I later verified as most likely true. I forget how I verified it, but it
was pre-Google. 

Bill Scott


>>> "Mike Palij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/27/08 5:44 PM
>>>
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:15:21 -0700, Marc Carter
>According to Gilovich, it's Artemus Ward .
>
>"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us into 
>trouble.It's the things we know that just ain't so."

Annette Taylor emailed me that it was Ward and with
the corrected quote but a quick google search raises some
doubts.  One of the hits was on Amazon for a book by
Ralph Keyes entitled "The Quote Verifier: Who Said What, 
Where, and When".  The quote in question is on page 3
(Amazon allows page views) and it is attributed to Josh Billings
aka Henry Wheeler Shaw. Artemus and others are identified
but Keyes says that it is likely that Twain paraphrased 
Billings' quote in one of his works.

I wonder if there is anything more definitive.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Palij [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:46 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Michael Palij
Subject: RE: [tips] why psychology is hard

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:41:25 -0700, Jim Clark wrote:
>Hi
>
>Are we sure that psychology is hard?  Or, to be more precise, harder 
>than other intro level courses?

I don't know what data there is on this point but in addition to the
general academic "skills building" in the article, implicit is the
notion that people walk into intro psych classes with a "folk
psychology"
that leads them to think that they (a) know what psychology is about and
(b) rely upon their understanding to guide them in interpreting
psychological research, theories, and explanations.
"Folk biology", "folk physics", and other "commonsense
explanations"
about the world will tend to get challenged in high school science
courses which should make the college intro courses in those areas less
susceptible to this form of "proactive interference effect".

This led me to think of the following quote:

"It's not what we don't know that hurts us, it's what we know
that isn't
so."

It then dawned on me that I didn't really know who the source was for
this.  I had taught that it was Mark Twain but a check of a couple of
Twain quote websites doesn't include it (though there are some websites
that quote Twain as saying it).  I have also see it attributed to Will
Rogers and Milton Erikson as well as to no one in particular (i.e., "the
old adage").  

So, who is the source?

-Mike Palij
New York University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

P.S.  Apparently there are a couple of versions of this saying, so the
one above may not be accurate.

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



      
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to