I recalled that the titles were slightly different. They were not different, except for capitalization in the citation that came up in PsycInfo.
But, maybe there was a reason for the republishing. I was just noticing that the PDFs for the full text versions are substantially different (228K vs 330K). The later published version being larger. It may be that a table or figure was excluded from the first version and they published the entire article again. That is unusual, because don¹t they typically just publish a correction in the later journal, not the whole article? Maybe someone who can see the full text version (I was able to see it back when this was originally on my desk) can compare them. I recall them being identical in all ways. # 1. Violent Computer Games and Their Effects on State Hostility and Physiological Arousal.Preview Arriaga, Patrícia; Esteves, Francisco; Carneiro, Paula; Monteiro, Maria Benedicta; Aggressive Behavior, Vol 32(4), Jul-Aug 2006. pp. 358-371. [Journal Article] # 2. Violent computer games and their effects on state hostility and physiological arousal.Preview Arriaga, Patricia; Esteves, Francisco; Carneiro, Paula; Monteiro, Maria Benedicta; Aggressive Behavior, Vol 32(2), Mar-Apr 2006. pp. 146-158. [Journal Article] Paul -- Paul Bernhardt Frostburg State University Frostburg, MD, USA On 10/28/08 11:32 AM, "Rick Froman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Paul mentioned that they were both published, two months apart, in the same > journal. I would be interested in knowing if the editors might have changed > and the duplication was due to an error in the handing off of duties from one > editor to the next. I can¹t imagine one editor forgetting that they had > published the same paper two months earlier. > > Rick > > > Dr. Rick Froman, Chair > Division of Humanities and Social Sciences Box 3055 > x7295 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://tinyurl.com/DrFroman > > Proverbs 14:15 "A simple man believes anything, but a prudent man gives > thought to his steps." > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:29 AM > To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) > Subject: Re: [tips] info > > > > Hi Paul, I would contact the editor of each journal and let them know about > your discovery. If they are, indeed, an instance of duplicate publication or > simply two papers with different data sharing a lot of text in common, the > editors will, in turn, contact, the authors' institutions. In these > situations, it is typically the institution that handles the investigation. > > > > Miguel > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul C Bernhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:50:10 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [tips] info > > > A student and I stumbled upon two identical papers with slightly different > titles published in the same journal two months apart. > > The assignment was for the students to find two papers on a topic of interest > and compare and contrast the researcher¹s findings in the two papers. I didn¹t > rule out the papers being from the same authors. He came to me to ask if the > paper he¹d found was a good one and I told him it was, but he was having > trouble finding a second paper. So, we did some PsyInfo searching and found a > second paper by the same authors, then after about a minute¹s reading realized > the paper was, word for word, identical. > > I was stunned. There was no indication that it was a major revision because of > an error in the first version, there were no material differences between the > two versions at all. > > In the back of my mind I was thinking: ³I¹ll bet these jokers are claiming two > pubs in their CV.² --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
