Reading over these posts on entitlement and agreeing with them all has
encouraged me to give these issues direct 'attention with emphasis' when
discussing my courses with my students at the beginning of each semester. 
I give 7 essay tests as well as a take-home final and do allow for one
make up test--sorry you all.  But I don't drop the lowest grade, an option
 which most students appear to be accustomed.  Whatever, despite the large
number of exams I give, I ALWAYS am asked about opportunities for
extra-credit.  My ongoing suspicions has been that our students have
become accustomed throughout high school to teachers using extra-credit as
well as 'trying real hard' as significant contributions to the final
grade--a notion supported by you folks.

Therefore, if we wish to impress upon our students that grades are only
determined by their performance on course assignments, period, then this
method of evaluation will necessitate proper attention a number of times
throughout the semester.  That is, what we feel should be apparent to our
students relative to how we evaluate after we review our syllabus clearly
is not.  Instead, many students appear to base their assumptions not on
our syllabi, per se, but instead (and logically enough) on their own past
experiences.  So we need to accept this and directly address this
possibility and how university/college level courses are (or should be)
different from high school courses.

Joan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> I ask them why I would give extra work to those not able to show minimum
> knowledge on the exams.  I urge them to put more effort into studying
> effectively.  I do provide bonus pts now and then to those whose work is
> outstanding, but no extra credit otherwise.  Gary
>
> Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D.
> Professor, Psychology
> Saginaw Valley State University
> University Center, MI 48710
> 989-964-4491
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---
> To make changes to your subscription contact:
>
> Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to