Hi All, I don't know when I first joined TIPS but I found the first message that I sent and managed to save. Ironically, I was responding to one of Michael's posts and have pasted both his question and my response below. Of course, when I looked at it, I recalled a more recent Michael post. Ten years go by but . . .
Having a great time at NITOP! Any other Tipsters in St. Pete? Best, Linda *************** Subject: Re: the corpus callosum From: "Linda M. Woolf" <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 11:53:56 -0500 To: [email protected] Michael Sylvester wrote: > > Can LeVay be seriously objective about gay behavior since > > he is gay himself? Can psychologists be seriously objective about studying human behavior since we are ourselves human? ******************** [tips] Simon Levay Msylvester Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:22:28 -0800 A criticism of Simon Levay is that he may be biased re the genetic basis of gay behavior because he is gay himself. And that his pronouncement of differences in the corpus callosum of gay men may be more fiction than fact. ******************* -- Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D. Professor, Psychology and International Human Rights Past-President, Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, & Violence (Div. 48, APA) <http://www.peacepsych.org> Steering Committee, Psychologists for Social Responsibility (PsySR) <http://www.psysr.org> Secretary, Raphael Lemkin Award Committee, Institute for the Study of Genocide <http://www.instituteforthestudyofgenocide.org/> Webster University 470 East Lockwood St. Louis, MO 63119 Main Webpage: http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/ <http://www.webster.edu/%7Ewoolflm/> [email protected] "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's (and woman's) best friend. . . . Inside a dog, it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([email protected])
