They are assimilating it into their current concept of what is poetry and, in 
this case, what it is not.

Rick

Rick Froman
[email protected]

From: DeVolder Carol L [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:59 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] Piaget and Poetry


I can't help but wonder though, where you would put someone who refused to 
assimilate or accommodate, and simply said, "It wasn't poetry."

Carol

Carol DeVolder, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Chair, Department of Psychology
St. Ambrose University
Davenport, Iowa  52803
phone: 563-333-6482
e-mail: [email protected]

From: Michael Britt [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:04 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Piaget and Poetry


Ok, now it's starting to come together for me.  Ken what you're saying here 
fits in with another thought that came to me the other day.  Here goes: if I 
think "poetry" consists of what I find on a birthday card:

I hope you enjoy your birthday,
All the pleasures it has in store,
And because I appreciate you,
I hope you have many more!

Then the benediction by Rev. Joseph Lowery ("...when yellow will be mellow ... 
when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. 
..") - which by the way was received very positively - and indeed your 
limerick, would easily be assimilated as "poetry".  However, Ms. Alexander's 
poem was just too different for many people to be able to assimilate.  So, one 
would need to accommodate one's schema of "poetry" (assuming, as Gary pointed 
out in a previous post, that a person saw this issue as an "an environmental 
challenge" that needed resolving).  Agreed?

Michael

Michael Britt
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.thepsychfiles.com<http://www.thepsychfiles.com>






On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Ken Steele wrote:


One example could be Jabberwocky...

'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

The words are nonsense but it sounds meaningful because it fits our schema of 
what a poem should sound like.

Ken

Michael Britt wrote:
Ok.  I'll buy that.  So, can you give an example of how assimilation would 
occur in this context?
Michael
Michael Britt
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
www.thepsychfiles.com <http://www.thepsychfiles.com>
On Jan 28, 2009, at 8:02 PM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
wrote:



Any time you modify a schema to take in new information, that is accomodation.
In a message dated 1/28/2009 1:08:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> writes:

   So the first question is: Is adding into your     schema of "poetry" that 
"poetry is words that evoke images" an
   example     of assimilation or accommodation?   I'm thinking assimilation.



---------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Professor and Assistant Chairperson
Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
---------------------------------------------------------------


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)



---





To make changes to your subscription contact:










Bill Southerly ([email protected])


---

To make changes to your subscription contact:



Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to