Exactly; the literature on the "millennials" would suggest stronger
rather than weaker attachments -- by far.

I'm very wary of clinical "experience."  I sure as hell don't want my
doctor recommending surgery on the basis of his experience; I want him
to make recommendations based on the data.

m

-------
Marc L Carter, PhD
Associate Professor and Chair
Department of Psychology 
Baker University College of Arts & Sciences
-------
"I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when you
looked at it the right way, did not become more complicated."
--  Paul Anderson 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:41 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: Re: [tips] Dr. Gordon Neufeld
> 
> My "gut" reaction is to ask what is his evidence that (a) 
> children have poorer attachment these days--if anything a 
> plethora of evidentiary publications have suggested that the 
> millenials are supremely attached; and (b) that this is a 
> significant change from past attachment patterns. Let's see, 
> first half of the 1900's--our grandparents' 
> generation--attachment was stronger when kids had to leave 
> home early and start working full time at much more labor 
> intensive jobs than they have now? "Stay-at-home" moms were 
> busy working their butts off around the house and having 
> siblings care for one another? Compared to today's "stay at 
> home" mom? My anecdotal and professional experience suggests 
> we have much stronger attachment patterns. I just want to 
> say, "please, give me a break!" but I don't have time to 
> accumulate my own evidence as I have other fish to fry.
> Sounds like another smooth talker a la John Gray, Phil McGraw...
> 
> Annette
> Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D.
> Professor of Psychology
> University of San Diego
> 5998 Alcala Park
> San Diego, CA 92110
> 619-260-4006
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:41:45 -0500
> >From: "Gerald Peterson" <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Re: [tips] Dr. Gordon Neufeld
> >To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
> ><[email protected]>
> >
> >   My only quick reaction is that his "evidence" speaks
> >   for itself...and most should know the evidential
> >   value of personal experiences.  As you note: "Dr.
> >   Neufeld states that the work he presents is the
> >   accumulation of his research, clinical, and life
> >   experiences."  I am sure he is insightful,
> >   stimulating, fun and ... yet, I wonder what
> >   questions people are/should be asking him, whether
> >   they engage in critical thinking any more than our
> >   students?    Gary
> >    
> >    
> >    
> >   Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D.
> >   Professor, Psychology
> >   Saginaw Valley State University
> >   University Center, MI 48710
> >   989-964-4491
> >   [email protected]
> >
> >   >>> "Jean-Marc Perreault"
> >   <[email protected]> 3/5/2009 10:21 AM
> >   >>>
> >   Hi Everyone,
> >
> >   I have recently come accross work by Dr. Gordon
> >   Neufeld, clinical and developmental psychologist. He
> >   is presently in my town giving a week-long workshop
> >   entitled: Making Sense of Kids. Although I am not
> >   attending the workshop, my partner (who is a teacher
> >   in primary school) is. She is loving it. The entire
> >   workshop is revolving around attachment issues and
> >   how society is moving in a direction that does not
> >   foster proper attachment between kids and their
> >   parents. I have looked at the workshop document and
> >   it looks good, but it does not have references.
> >   Instead, Dr. Neufeld states that the work he
> >   presents is the accumulation of his research,
> >   clinical, and life experiences.
> >
> >   I was wondering if anyone on this list has knowledge
> >   of his work, and whether you would like to comment
> >   on the validity of what he presents. As I said, his
> >   stuff makes a lot of sense, thus has much face
> >   value. I am wondering about what the scientific
> >   community is thinking.
> >
> >   My understanding is that he is essentially trying to
> >   bring a paradigm shift in how we raise children.
> >
> >   Any info would be much appreciated.
> >
> >   Cheers all!
> >
> >   Jean-Marc
> >
> > ---
> > To make changes to your subscription contact:
> >
> > Bill Southerly ([email protected])
> 
> ---
> To make changes to your subscription contact:
> 
> Bill Southerly ([email protected])
> 

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to