|
Michael Smith wrote:
Dear Colleagues, By way of an analogy, I'm not really concerned whether medical researchers have a great deal of empathy or social interaction skills. These are skills I do value in my doctor. Nonetheless, I very much want my physician/surgeon to be grounded in the science of medicine. I would similarly hope that medical students also care about science. Clinical work is more than social interaction and empathy. If that was all that was required, we would just need a few good friends. Clinical work should be grounded in empirically valid and culturally appropriate practice. This represents many challenges, in part, as we are still learning so much particularly in relation to biological and multicultural influences. Nonetheless, the APA Ethics Code 2.04 Bases for Scientific and Professional Judgments is quite clear--"Psychologists' work is based upon established scientific and professional knowledge of the discipline." For students to not care about the science of psychology suggests that they do not understand psychology or the skills/knowledge needed related to clinical practice. In terms of science-related psychology positions, there are many positions within business, government, law, industry, NASA, etc. The Monitor has had several articles highlighting science careers outside of academia (e.g., see http://www.apa.org/monitor/2008/04/careers.html and http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb01/careerpath.html ). The APA Science Directorate has an interesting page illustrating several career options - http://www.apa.org/science/nonacad_careers.html . Best wishes, Linda --
Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D. Professor, Psychology and International Human Rights Past-President, Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, & Violence (Div. 48, APA) Webster University 470 East Lockwood St. Louis, MO 63119 Main Webpage: http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/ [email protected] "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's (and woman's) best friend. . . . Inside a dog, it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx --- |
Title: tag
- [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Gerald Peterson
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Michael Smith
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Rick Froman
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Gerald Peterson
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Stuart McKelvie
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? taylor
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Gerald Peterson
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Marc Carter
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Michael Smith
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Rick Stevens
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Joan Warmbold
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Rick Froman
- Re: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Joan Warmbold
- RE: [tips] Relevance of science to psych work? Helweg-Larsen, Marie

