Michael has apparently confused "creative" and "divergent" with "wrong."
The Milgram study was replicated (with minorities and women) two years ago. The results were essentially the same. This matter has been discussed in this forum several times already. The replication, by Jerry Burger of UC Santa Clara, was published early this year in /American Psychologist/. The abstract is here: http://tinyurl.com/oul9mu . You will have to depend on your own access to the journal to read the whole article. Regards, Chris -- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 416-736-2100 ex. 66164 [email protected] http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ ========================== [email protected] wrote: > > > No African-Americans,Hispanics.and women. > Subjects were paid. > The real issues were the reasons given for shocking which were > confounded by his presence. > A replication through re-enactment by baldie Rosenhahn (the same dude > who got himself locked up in a psychiatric > institution) demonstrated that excuses given for shocking were > correlated with stages of moral development. > There has been no replication of Milgram. > Daniel Ellsberg of the Pentagon papers tried to see similarities > between the Milgram study and the massacre at My Lai in Vietnam. > And sibce I am the only creative and divergent thinker on Tips,I > wonder what would the results be if the sreams > were that of confederates being tortured by water boarding. > > Michael Sylvester.PhD > Daytona Beach,Florida > > > --- > To make changes to your subscription contact: > > Bill Southerly ([email protected]) > --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([email protected])
